top of page

CASE / CORA BANK / AI OPERATIONS

Turning high-volume customer emails into reviewed AI-assisted responses.

Cora’s customer service operation handled a high volume of email requests through manual response workflows. Repetitive tasks consumed agent time, limited scalability and increased operational costs.

I helped design Gepetto Skills, an internal AI product that generated contextual response drafts from customer messages and account data, while keeping people responsible for validation, quality and final delivery.

92%

Operational requests

Semi-automated within three months

Seconds

To generate a response draft

Preserving quality and accountability

COMPANY / CORA BANK

PRODUCT / GEPETTO SKILLS

ROLE / PRODUCT DESIGNER

AI OPERATIONS / GEPETTO SKILLS

FROM MANUAL EMAIL HANDLING TO REVIEWED AI RESPONSES

gepetto skills cover.png

PROBLEM / A REPETITIVE OPERATIONAL LOOP

Every new email restarted work the operation had already solved before.

Analysts repeatedly interpreted similar requests, searched for account context and assembled responses manually. As volume increased, capacity remained tied to repetitive writing and additional BPO support.

INCOMING EMAIL

An unstructured customer request enters the service queue

CONTEXT LOOKUP

The analyst searches for account and operational information

RESPONSE ASSEMBLY

Similar answers are written again from the beginning

HUMAN CHECK

Accuracy, tone and customer context still require validation

SCALE LIMIT

More volume requires more manual capacity and operational cost

STRATEGIC DECISION / AUTOMATE THE DRAFT, KEEP THE DECISION HUMAN

Design for assisted judgment before full automation.

TRADE-OFF / The first release kept human validation mandatory, prioritizing safety, traceability and operational learning before expanding automation.

Generative AI could reduce repetitive writing, but customer service responses involved personal information, account context and operational risk. The workflow required control over accuracy, tone and final delivery.

We designed Gepetto as a semi-automated experience. AI generated a contextual draft, while an analyst reviewed, edited and approved every response before it was sent.

To make this reliable, we first structured service tags, skill ownership, testing and performance tracking. This created a foundation for measuring each skill and improving it over time.

An internal hackathon, Corathon, helped align Design, Engineering, Data, Cybersecurity, TechOps and CX around the capabilities and constraints of a recent technology.

EVIDENCE  →  5 IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS  →  CROSS-FUNCTIONAL IDEATION  →  IMPACT-EFFORT PRIORITIZATION  →  MARKET & TECH RESEARCH

SOLUTION / THREE CONNECTED EXPERIENCES

One operational loop for creating, reviewing and improving AI skills.

Gepetto connected three needs that are often separated in AI initiatives: building reusable skills, embedding response generation in the service workflow and measuring whether each skill was useful.

Managers could create and assign skills by service topic. Analysts received contextual drafts to review. Accuracy and response-time data supported continued improvement.

HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP - INTERNAL DATA GOVERNANCE - SKILL OWNERSHIP - ACCURACY + TIME TRACKING

new skill card cover.png

01

Skill Setup & Ownership

Managers create a skill for a recurring service topic, define its instructions, connect it to operational tags and assign responsibility for its evolution.

Explore solution
mailbox card cover.png

02

AI-Assisted Review

Customer email and account context generate a draft inside the service workflow, where the analyst can review, edit and approve the response.

Explore solution
performance card cover.png

03

Testing & Performance

A separate environment lets teams compare generated drafts with expected responses and track accuracy and response time by skill.

Explore solution

IMPACT / THREE OPERATIONAL SHIFTS

AI became a governed operational capability.

PRODUCT PRINCIPLE

AUTOMATE REPETITION. PRESERVE HUMAN ACCOUNTABILITY.

Gepetto created operational value by combining fast response generation with clear ownership, measurable quality and mandatory human review.

01

MANUAL RESPONSE WRITING

92% OF OPERATIONAL REQUESTS SEMI-AUTOMATED

Reusable skills covered most recurring service demands while analysts remained responsible for final delivery.

02

AI USE OUTSIDE THE WORKFLOW

→  CONTROLLED INTERNAL GOVERNANCE

Response generation, customer context, skill ownership and testing moved into an internal platform with traceability.

03

CAPACITY TIED TO REPETITIVE TICKETS

→  LOWER BPO DEPENDENCE AND MORE AGENT CAPACITY

Reduced response effort and BPO costs allowed agents to dedicate more time to complex requests and professional development.

RESPONSE DRAFTS IN SECONDS

Recurring emails became ready-to-review drafts inside the service workflow.

REDUCED BPO DEPENDENCE

Increased internal capacity reduced the need to scale repetitive work through external contracts.

Gepetto turned recurring emails into ready-to-review drafts in seconds, with traceability and human oversight built into the workflow.

CONTACT / AVAILABLE WORLDWIDE

Let’s talk about what you’re building.

Available for remote product design roles and selected freelance projects. Based in Brazil, working worldwide.

bottom of page